Oct 16, 2016 Ahmed Juhany
The idea of universal basic income is simple. Every citizen will receive a certain amount of money, regardless of their income. Interestingly, now both the Finnish state and Y Combinator, the world’s leading startup accelerator, are about to run limited parallel experiments on basic income in 2017. Finland starts with a random sample of 2,000 people and we at Demos Helsinki helped to create the experiment framework. Finland wants to see if basic income increases employment and decreases bureaucracy, while Y Combinator looks from the perspective of subjective well-being and people’s activity in general.
The two approaches could not be further apart. When I met Y Combinator’s basic income team, they explained that their reason for experimenting came from technological disruption: if technology eliminates jobs or jobs continue to become less secure, an increasing number of people will be unable to make ends meet with earnings from employment. At the same time advances like artificial intelligence might lead to a couple decades of us creating more wealth than we ever could have imagined before. Instead, Finnish Government sees basic income primarily as a way of creating more supply of labor as well as a way of saving government’s money.
In the past year that I’ve been actively following the discussion around basic income and participating in what has quickly grown into a global scene of basic income enthusiasts, I’ve been astonished by the diversity of the basic income proponents. Freelancers and entrepreneurs see basic income as the support structure for the age of precarious work, sharing economy and platforms. Economists and technologists see it as a possibility to sustain middle classes in the wake of automatisation. Environmentalists see it as a way to reach wellbeing within the boundaries of the planet, while founders see it as the easiest form of pre-seed funding. The list goes on.
I agree with most of these viewpoints. However, I also see universal basic income as something far more significant than just another state handout. It’s not about the poor, or even about the freelancers, entrepreneurs or other precarious workers. It’s not about the robots and platforms. It’s about reprogramming fiscal and economic activities of the state and that’s not peanuts, roughly 50% of all cash flow is through the state.
Basic income can be the moonshot of our generation. Moonshot was never about getting to the moon. There was nothing on the moon. Kennedy and his administration knew that. The point is that each generation must have their mission, something that encapsulates their vision. The outcome of the moonshot was not a rocket that could fly humans to the moon. Far from that. The outcome of the moonshot was legitimizing the unforeseen public investments into science and technology. Rest, as we know, is history. Taxpayers’ money created technologies that entrepreneurs could then commercialize, innovations from internet to smart phones are based on IP created as long as 50 years ago.
Therefore, it’s very important to understand universal basic income as an opportunity to create a new universal monetary system. A programmable network of value that reaches every single citizen. Understood in this way, basic income starts to be a very interesting experiment. It’s precisely these universal innovations that have historically renewed the very core of the state, i.e. how people understand its role and their own relationship to it. If you’re really interested in renewing the biggest and the most powerful institution in the world, start looking for universals and how to renew them or even how to create new ones. Universals are the very hard core of the state; the law is same for everyone.
The possibilities for innovation in basic income are endless. Think if we could program universal basic income. Think if basic income would be paid in a blockchain-based form. Then we could for example decide that if it’s invested into a startup, or if it is used within 100 meters from the recipients home, the amount increases by 10%. What if pooling basic incomes would give them a better interest rate than keeping them on an individual account. This would open an entirely new way of governing society.
Our generation does not lack a mission. It’s about freeing our collective creative capacity from the industrial imperative of growth and thereby from natural resource constraints. We want and know we can reach a new level of flourishing through collective expressions of self autonomous of the industrial modes of production. This is why millennials are voting for anti-establishment leaders, this why we want to work in startups, and most importantly why basic income brings together people from so many political and ideological backgrounds.
So basic income is the moonshot that can deliver a positive vision for the 21th century. It’s best seen as a platform, on which several different political views can come together to deliberate beyond the tweakings of old systems and to try and experiment and create something entirely new. It can also become a platform, or even the operating system of the post industrial state. Now, the question is how we could open basic income as a platform for different application developers. What if basic income could be applied as an innovation fee, data dividend, civic seed funding, local blockchain-based currency, installment in time bank or match money for your crowdfunding purposes? The possibilities, once this really holds true, are infinite.
This December, with Atomico and Orrick, Slush will once again publish the annual State of European Tech report. It is the most comprehensive deep-dive into the European ecosystem. Coming out for the fourth time, this year’s report will bring diversity and inclusion into focus, to highlight the importance of the issue at hand. Take the survey […]
One of the Slush core missions now and forever is the advancement of entrepreneurs’ and investors’ abilities to navigate the tech ecosystem and invest with impact. Yesterday, we took yet another leap towards attaining this goal with the release of The State of South Asian Tech (SEA) report in Singapore, yesterday. Like the State of […]
Happeo, a digital workplace platform focusing on smoothening the collaboration between employees of large companies, recently raised $8M for their seed round, having names such as Gapps, Vendep, DN Capital and Maki.vc amongst their investors. We had a chat with Happeo CEO Perttu Ojansuu in order to learn a bit more about the journey behind […]
Slush talks a lot about the different phases of founding a startup. We talk about building, scaling, growing, recruiting, funding and everything in between. All of these things are essential, but to understand the relevance of everything we do, we should also look into the very DNA of what a startup is and where they […]
Helsinki-based Yousician, the world’s leading music education company, has been on an almost decade long journey of learning about gamifying, community building, and of course, learning new instruments. CEO and co-founder Chris Thür has been leading the charge towards the company’s goal of making musicality as common as literacy, and overseen lots of change in […]
Last week, a new era for Slush Global Impact Accelerator kicked off. Slush hosted a workshop for startup hub managers – coming from five different countries – in Botswana. For the past three years, the GIA team has been running the program all the way from Finland. However, now we’ve decided to take off from […]
Day 2 at Slush Tokyo 2018 started with a bang, as IDEO Partner Tom Kelley walked into the Dome to have a Fireside Chat with Slush Tokyo CEO Antti Sonninen. The two discussed Slush and design thinking, and Tom took further questions from the audience during his Q&A session at the Slush Cafe. IDEO Partner […]
Among all the Swedish startup success stories, the story of Truecaller definitely stands out. Their app has turned the traditional phonebook into a practical call screening app, and their founder and CEO Alan Mamedi started it all at 25 years old. Being a smart man, he has taken the opportunity to learn. He now wants to share […]
After Al Gore’s phenomenal Opening Keynote Speech, Founder Stage was taken over by some of the leading names of European tech. Niklas Zennström, Brent Hoberman, David Thevenon and Sophie Bendz came together to talk about the European entrepreneurial ecosystem and the importance of daring to address the biggest problems in the world. What do the […]
Make sure to secure yours now.
We collect cookies to make your experience here smoother.